Office of the Regional Executive for Biology - Central Region

About USGS /  Science Topics /  Maps, Products & Publications /  Partnerships /  Education /  Newsroom /  Jobs

Monitoring Breakout Group

Facilitator: Tom Stohlgren

1.      Justification  

·        Existing laws and mandates

·        Monitoring needed to help decide if management actions are working

·        Critical for early detection

·        Determine effectiveness and treatments and restoration actions

·        Monitor controls on non-target species (native species)  

Objectives

·        Raise awareness of importance of monitoring

·        Meet land management goals

·        Evaluate effects of treatments

·        Data for adaptive management applications  

Agency mandates may vary

·        NPS - I&M guidelines and a mandate to protect native species

·        BLM - rangeland health

·        FWS - T&E species protection, habitat protection

·        FS and National Grasslands - to protect native species

·        Interaction with adjacent public and private land managers  

2.      Standards  

·        NAWMA standards

·        Need some flexibility, but also need to consider the importance of comparability

·        Mapping standards set stage for monitoring

·        Ultimate result must be useful to field managers

·        Need for consistency

·        Coordination across agencies and state and private land owners and managers

·        Look for overlap with other monitoring activities  

Take advantage of existing standards:  

·        Mapping standards

·        Plot and transect standards  

3.      Procedures and methods (protocols)  

·        Driven by land management objectives

·        Must meet land managers goals

·        Also meet regional and national priorities  

4.      Products  

·        Provide guidelines for managers

·        Decision Support Systems

·        Provide training opportunities (team approach)

·        Ancillary data (soil, fire and other disturbance) all important for modeling aspects

·        Model products – data from other organizations can help predict what may be coming in (early detection)  

5.      Research  

·        Analyze bias in data

·        Restoration techniques associated with control and treatments

·        Effects of biological controls

·        Effects on non-target species  

6.      Modeling  

·        Identify where to monitor based on predictive models and where to add monitoring sites (iterative approach)

·        Include economic modeling

·        Risk assessments and priorities

·        Predictive models – at land manager site specific resolution

·        Change detection

·        Predictive spatial/temporal models – where and when will invasives occur  

7.      Collaborative Activities  

·        Share data and monitoring information

·        Volunteers can play a role (look at existing systems, some on the web)

·        Baseline information, early detection

·        Build political constituency

·        Leverage other monitoring efforts (fire, forests health)

·        Different levels of need (ecosystem vs site specific)

·        GPRA goals

NBII

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America home page. USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: http://biology.usgs.gov/cro/I-workshp/monitoring.htm
Page Contact Information: tlwilliams@usgs.gov
Page Last Modified: Thursday, March 1, 2007