Identification_Information: Citation: Citation_Information: Originator: U.S. Geological Survey Originator: Department of the Interior Publication_Date: 199810 Title: Accuracy Assessment Points for Devils Tower National Monument Vegetation Mapping Project Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: database and report Series_Information: Series_Name: USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Issue_Identification: Devils Tower National Monument Publication_Information: Publication_Place: Denver, CO Publisher: USGS Biological Resources Division, Center for Biological Informatics Online_Linkage: http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/ftp/vegmapping/deto/detoaa.zip Larger_Work_Citation: Citation_Information: Originator: US Dept of Interior Originator: National Biological Survey (aka National Biological Service) Originator: [Now the Biological Resources Division of USGS] Originator: and National Park Service Publication_Date: 199411 Title: Field Assessment Procedures Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document Edition: Final Draft Publication_Information: Publication_Place: Denver, CO Publisher: USGS/BRD/Center for Biological Informatics Other_Citation_Details: Report prepared by the USGS Center for Biological Informatics in cooperation with Environmental Systems Research Institute, 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA. Online_Linkage: http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/deto/detopirpt.pdf#aamethod Description: Abstract: The accuracy assessment field work was performed in July and August, 1996 to verify the accuracy of the vegetation communities spatial data developed by the USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program for Devils Tower National Monument. The data points were randomly distributed stratified according to vegetation association over the project area according to protocols developed by the Program. Points were located by GPS navigation and the community information was collected at the point, without knowledge of the attributes of the vegetation spatial data. The data points were compared to the attributes of the polygon in which they were contained. Attributes of the polygons or accuracy assessment points that did not match were changed during later analysis due to errors in the AA methodology or map attribution errors. A contingency table was completed from the final dataset. Purpose: These data were necessary assess the mapping effort in addition to meeting the requirements of the mapping program. Supplemental_Information: All codes used in the digital file are referenced by the look-up table that accompanies this file. The look-up table is called veg.lut. It contains both the common name and latin names of the vegetation types. Time_Period_of_Content: Time_Period_Information: Range_of_Dates/Times: Beginning_Date: 199607 Ending_Date: 199608 Currentness_Reference: Ground Condition Status: Progress: Complete Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned Spatial_Domain: Bounding_Coordinates: West_Bounding_Coordinate: -104.75 East_Bounding_Coordinate: -104.63 North_Bounding_Coordinate: 44.63 South_Bounding_Coordinate: 44.5 Description_of_Geographic_Extent: Devils Tower National Monument and about a 2 mile environ around Monument Boundaries - Black Hills, Wyoming, USA Keywords: Theme: Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: none Theme_Keyword: National Park Service Theme_Keyword: U.S. Geological Service Theme_Keyword: Center for Biological Informatics Theme_Keyword: land cover Theme_Keyword: vegetation Theme_Keyword: alliance Theme_Keyword: association Place: Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Place_Keyword: Devils Tower National Monument Place_Keyword: Black Hills Place_Keyword: Wyoming Place_Keyword: USA Taxonomy: Keywords/Taxon: Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Taxonomic_Keywords: plant communities Taxonomic_Classification: Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom Taxon_Rank_Value: Plantae Access_Constraints: None Use_Constraints: Any person using the information presented here should fully understand the data collection and compilation procedures, as described in these metadata, before beginning analyses. The burden for determining fitness for use lies entirely with the user. For purposes of publication or dissemination, citations or credit should be given to the U.S. Geological Survey and the National Park Service. Point_of_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: USGS BRD Center for Biological Informatics Contact_Person: USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Coordinator Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Room 8000, MS 302 City: Denver State_or_Province: Colorado Postal_Code: 80225 Contact_Voice_Telephone: (303) 202-4220 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 303-202-4219 Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: gs-b-npsveg@usgs.gov Browse_Graphic: Browse_Graphic_File_Name: http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/deto/images/detoaa.pdf Browse_Graphic_File_Description: 365 kbyte file showing vegetation associations and location of accuracy assessment points Browse_Graphic_File_Type: PDF Native_Data_Set_Environment: UNIX-ARC/INFO Data_Quality_Information: Attribute_Accuracy: Attribute_Accuracy_Report: The attributes for the accuracy assessment were recorded in the field from July and August, 1996. Vegetation associations were identified based on the field key and plant identification. If additional communities were found within a 50 meter radius of the plot center, they were recorded as well. During the analysis, it was concluded that some attributes were in error and changed to match the mapped attributes. This was done by examination of the aerial photographs under stereoscopic view. The attributes were in error due to 1) spatial error in the GPS derived coordinates (4-8 meters), 2) change of vegetation community due to temporal changes, or mis-identification of the community on the ground. Logical_Consistency_Report: All attributes are codes that correspond to vegetation communities and have been checked for typographical and logical errors. Completeness_Report: All points were collected and analyzed. Positional_Accuracy: Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy: Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report: The points were located using a military-style GPS receiver (PLGR), which has a published accuracy of 4-8 meters. Vertical_Positional_Accuracy: Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report: Not applicable Lineage: Methodology: Methodology_Type: Field Methodology_Identifier: Methodology_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Methodology_Keyword: Accuracy Assessment Methodology_Description: To assess the thematic accuracy of the vegetation map we conducted an accuracy assessment that allows the user of the digital information an additional perspective upon the data. The final product attempts to achieve the 80% per class accuracy required for this product. Not all mapping units were tested for accuracy. Since the final map contains two separate classification systems, only the mapped areas that fall under the NVCS were included in the accuracy assessment. Areas such as agricultural and undescribed vegetation units and other areas classified using Anderson Level II classification were eliminated from the sample process. Besides excluding the Anderson classified polygons we also excluded vegetation polygons visited and sampled during either the vegetation description or verification phase that were small enough to confidently say were entirely correct. These were typically riparian polygons in Hell Canyon. These small polygons were eliminated from a site visit in the random selection process but were included in the final accuracy assessment matrix. The remaining areas for sampling were then stratified and sampled according to the number of polygons in each class and the area occupied by each class. Field Procedure: The field crew consisted of two botanists that were not involved in any part of the previous work on the park. This crew either worked together or separately depending upon local conditions. Both botanists were supplied with a list of points to visit, a field key for map class identification, field data forms, and a GPS to navigate to each site forms . Both crew members worked "blind', meaning that neither one was aware of the existing mapped class designations. Upon arriving at each site, the crews scanned a wide area around the immediate location and observed any local variation in the plant associations. Using the key, the crew then assigned a plant association to the accuracy point. In cases where the variation was significant the crew made a "best fit" judgment to the class name. In addition, other associations in the area and those that might be confused with other plant associations were also noted on each field form. Site Selection: The stratified random selection of accuracy assessment sites was done on the original map classes. The x and y coordinates of each accuracy point were derived from the original vegetation coverage. The coverage was gridded into 50 x 50 meter cells using ArcGrid. A 50-meter grid was chosen because it approximates the minimum mapping unit (MMU) for the project. Using a random number generator, we then re-selected the appropriate number of grids/samples from each class and put them into a separate grid. Additional points were selected for each class over the required number to allow the field crew some latitude in case some sites were inaccessible. The reselected cells where then converted into a point coverage. The x and y coordinate for each point was then transferred to an ascii file. This coordinate file was then used by the field team along with a GPS PLGR unit to locate the position in the field. The point coverage with the accuracy locations and the assigned map unit code are included as a digital coverage. Data Analysis: Due to the inherent heterogeneity of many natural systems, many of the map class determinations to be incorrect. However, when considered in the larger context were correct. To address this issue we attempted to include a 'fuzzy' protocol in analyzing the field accuracy data. For example, when the field crew visited a site they noted not only the appropriate vegetation association designation for the immediate area but also other associations present. When field codes where then compared with the mapped class the point was designated correct if it agreed with any of the associations noted on the field form. Source_Information: Source_Citation: Citation_Information: Originator: USGS-Biological resources Division Originator: U.S. National Park Originator: Depatment of the Interior Publication_Date: 199411 Title: Accuracy Assessment Procedures, NBS/NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document Publication_Information: Publication_Place: Denver, CO Publisher: USGS, Biological Resources Division, Center for Biological Informatics Other_Citation_Details: Prepared by: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Redlands, CA and National Center of Geographic Information and Analysis, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA and The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA under contract rom U.S. Department of the Interior Biological Resources Division and National Park Service. Type_of_Source_Media: electronic document Source_Time_Period_of_Content: Time_Period_Information: Range_of_Dates/Times: Beginning_Date: 199411 Ending_Date: Present Source_Currentness_Reference: publication date Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Accuracy Assessment Procedures Document Source_Contribution: This document established the procedures and protocols for the accuracy assessment at Devils Tower National Monument. Source_Information: Source_Citation: Citation_Information: Originator: U.S. Geological Survey Originator: Department of the Interior Publication_Date: 199809 Title: Devils Tower National Monument Spatial Vegetation Data: Cover type / Association level of the National Vegetation Classification System Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document Series_Information: Series_Name: USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Issue_Identification: Devils Tower National Monument Publication_Information: Publication_Place: Denver, CO Publisher: USGS, Biological Resources Division, Center for Biological Informatics Other_Citation_Details: Created in large part by Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Redlands, CA under contract rom USGS/ BRD/CBI. Type_of_Source_Media: Disc Source_Time_Period_of_Content: Time_Period_Information: Single_Date/Time: Calendar_Date: 19950725 Source_Currentness_Reference: ground condition Source_Citation_Abbreviation: Spatial data of vegetation communities for Devils Tower National Monument. Source_Contribution: The vegetation spatial data were tested for accuracy with the AA data. Process_Step: Process_Description: The accuracy assessment field work was performed in July 1996 to verify the accuracy of the vegetation communities spatial data developed by the USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program for Devils Tower National Monument. the data points were randomly distributed stratified according to vegetation association over the project area according to protocols developed by the Program. Points were located by GPS navigation and the community information was collected at the point, without knowledge of the attributes of the vegetation spatial data. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Spatial data of vegetation communities for Devils Tower National Monument. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Accuracy Assessment Procedure Document Process_Date: 199607 Spatial_Data_Organization_Information: Indirect_Spatial_Reference: Devils Tower National Monument is in Crook County in northeast Wyoming and is part of the western most Black Hills. The monument lies 10 miles east of the Bear Lodge Mountains and 10 miles south west of the town of Hulett, Wyoming. Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Point Point_and_Vector_Object_Information: SDTS_Terms_Description: SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: Point Spatial_Reference_Information: Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition: Planar: Grid_Coordinate_System: Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator Universal_Transverse_Mercator: UTM_Zone_Number: 13 Transverse_Mercator: Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -105 Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0 False_Easting: 500000 False_Northing: 0 Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: .9996 Planar_Coordinate_Information: Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: Coordinate Pair Coordinate_Representation: Abscissa_Resolution: 1 Ordinate_Resolution: 1 Planar_Distance_Units: Meters Geodetic_Model: Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983 Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80 Semi-major_Axis: 6378137 Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 297.257 Entity_and_Attribute_Information: Overview_Description: Entity_and_Attribute_Overview: The system is organized hierarchically to support conservation and resource stewardship applications across multiple scales. The upper levels of the hierarchy are based on the physical form or structure of the vegetation (physiognomy) and have been refined from the international standards developed by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The two most detailed levels of the hierearchy are based on the species composition of the existing vegetation (floristics) and reflect the phyto-sociological standards that were originally developed by European ecologists. The vegetation classification is continually advanced through the collection and analysis of new field data and will be greatly strengthened during the course of the NBS/NPS mapping efforts. National Park Service/Biological Resources Division Vegetation Inventory and Mapping Program for Devils Tower National Monument, Wyoming, Final Community Association Classification, May 1, 1998. Alliance/Community BB=Wyoming Big Sagebrush / Bluebrush Wheatgrass Shrub Herbaceous Vegetation BU=Green Ash - American Elm / Wolfberry Forest CP=Eastern Cottnwood Peach Leaf Willow / Narrow Leaf Willow Woodland GH=Grassland Complex MK=Mosaic - Kentucky Bluegrass / Little Bluestem Grassland MW=Mosaic - Western Wheatgrass / Little Bluestem Grassland PB=Ponderosa Pine / Bur Oak Woodland PJ=Ponderosa Pine / Common Juniper Woodland PP1=Ponderosa Pine Complex 1 PP2=Ponderosa Pine Complex II SC=Silver Sage Brush / Western - Wheat Grass Herbaceous Vegetation. Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: Grossman, D. Et al. 1994. National Park Service / National Biological Service Vegetation Mapping Project, National Vegetation Classification System 209 pp. Distribution_Information: Distributor: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: USGS BRD Center for Biological Informatics Contact_Person: USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Coordinator Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Room 8000, MS 302 City: Denver State_or_Province: Colorado Postal_Code: 80225 Contact_Voice_Telephone: (303) 202-4220 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 303-202-4219 Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: gs-b-npsveg@usgs.gov Distribution_Liability: The U.S. Geological Survey and the National Park Service shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. These data and related graphics (if available) are not legal documents and are not intended to be used as such. The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. The data are not better than the original sources from which they were derived. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent within the limitations of geospatial data in general and these data in particular. Any related graphics (if available) are intended to aid the data user in acquiring relevant data; it is not approriate to use the related graphics as data. The U.S. Geological Survey and the National Park Service gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. It is strongly recommended that these data are directly acquired from an U.S. Geological Survey and National Park Service servers and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the utility of the data on another system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data. It is also strongly recommended that careful attention be paid to the contents of the metadata file associated with these data. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this metadata report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey and National Park Service. Standard_Order_Process: Digital_Form: Digital_Transfer_Information: Format_Name: HTML Digital_Transfer_Option: Online_Option: Computer_Contact_Information: Network_Address: Network_Resource_Name: http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/deto/index.html Access_Instructions: Internet Access Fees: none Metadata_Reference_Information: Metadata_Date: 20011022 Metadata_Review_Date: 20100519 Metadata_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: USGS BRD Center for Biological Informatics Contact_Person: USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Coordinator Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Room 8000, MS 302 City: Denver State_or_Province: Colorado Postal_Code: 80225 Contact_Voice_Telephone: (303) 202-4220 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 303-202-4219 Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: gs-b-npsveg@usgs.gov Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001.1-1999 Metadata_Extensions: Online_Linkage: http://www.nbii.gov/portal/server.pt/community/fgdc_metadata/255