USGS - science for a changing world
National Park Service Home Page.

Biology - Biological Informatics Program - Vegetation Characterization Program

Field Plots FAQ Metadata

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title: Washita Battlefield National Historic Site Vegetation Mapping Project - Field Plot Points
Abstract:
This metadata is for the 2005 vegetation data points (spatial database) created from the sample vegetation plots collected at Washita Battlefield National Historic Site.
Supplemental_Information:
This GIS layer was created from the GPS coordinates recorded at the center of each plot.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    USBR Remote Sensing and GIS Group, Denver, Colorado, Unpublished Material, waba_plots: None None, None, None.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: None

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -99.712884
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -99.696058
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 35.624902
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 35.617574
    Description_of_Geographic_Extent: Washita Battlefield National Historic Site

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Calendar_Date: 2005
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):

      • Entity point (31)
      • Point (4)

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 14
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -99.000000
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.000000
      False_Easting: 500000.000000
      False_Northing: 0.000000

      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.000000
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.000000
      Planar coordinates are specified in meters

      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1983.
      The ellipsoid used is Geodetic Reference System 80.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.000000.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257222.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    waba_plots
    attributes from shapefile table (Source: Washita Battlefield National Historic Site)

    COMMENTS
    General Comments About the Data Collection (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual comments description of collected data.

    OTHER
    Description of the Other Category used in Cover Classes (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual description of other information found within the site.

    FID
    Internal feature number. (Source: ESRI)

    Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.

    Shape
    Feature geometry. (Source: ESRI)

    Coordinates defining the features.

    PLOT_CODE
    Unique Code Used to Identify Plots (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Unique plot number.

    PROV_NAME
    Provisional Name of Plant Association Recorded by Field Crew (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual common association name.

    ELCODE
    NVCS CODE for Plant Association (Source: NatureServe)

    Textual and numerical code.

    CLASS_NAME
    Classified Plant Association Name (Source: NatureServe)

    Textual Scientific association name.

    SUBLOC
    Sub-location of the Point in the Park (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual description of the sub-location.

    QUAD
    Name of the USGS Quadrangle (Source: Roger Sanders)

    USGS Quadrangle name.

    DRAINAGE
    Comments on the Soil Drainage within the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Soil drainage description type.

    PHENOLOGY
    Phenology of the Dominant Stratum in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual of leaf phenology type description.

    FIELD_X
    UTM X Value as Recorded in the Field (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Easting coordinate collected in the field.

    FIELD_Y
    UTM Y Value as Recorded in the Field (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Northing coordinate collected in the field.

    UTM_ZONE
    UTM Zone (Source: Roger Sanders)

    UTM Zone 14.

    DATE
    Date of Data Collection (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of the date the plot was observed.

    ZSROCKS
    Percent (%) of Small Rocks in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Percentage (i.e. 25.000 = 25%)

    DIRECTIONS
    General Directions to the Plot Center (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual direction description of locations.

    ZLITTER
    Percent (%) of Litter in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Percentage (i.e. 25.000 = 25%)

    SURVEYORS
    Names of the Surveyors Who Collected the Data (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual surveyors last name.

    XDIM
    X Dimension of Field Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual and numerical of X dimension (whole numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Meters

    YDIM
    Y Dimension of Field Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual and numerical of Y dimension (whole numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Meters

    PLOT_SHAPE
    Overall Shape of the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual defining the shape of the plot.

    PHOTOS
    Where Ground Photos Taken of the Plot (True/False) (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Ground photos relating to plot points.

    PERMANENT
    Is the Point Permanently Marked in the Field (Yes/No) (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual of yes/no for permanent plots.

    REPRESENT
    Description of How Representative the Point is of the Surrounding Vegetation or Polygon (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual of representiveness description.

    ELEV
    Elevation of the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical elevation of plot.

    ZWATER
    Percent (%) of Standing Water in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Percentage (i.e. 25.000 = 25%)

    ELEV_UNITS
    Units of the Elevation Values (feet/meters) (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Elevation units in feet/meters.

    TOPO_POS
    General Position of the Plot on the Landscape (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual of topology position type description.

    LANDFORM
    General Landform that the Plot Occurs On (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual of landform description.

    COWARDIN
    General Wetland Description (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual cowadrin classification description.

    HYDRO
    Comments on the Hydrology of the Soils in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual hydrology type description.

    ENVIRO
    General Environmental Comments about the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual of environment description.

    TEXTURE
    Soil Texture in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual of soil texture description.

    ZLROCKS
    Percent (%) of Large Rocks in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Percentage (i.e. 25.000 = 25%)

    ZSAND
    Percent (%) of Sand in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Percentage (i.e. 25.000 = 25%)

    ZWOOD
    Percent (%) of Dead and Down Wood in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Percentage (i.e. 25.000 = 25%)

    ZBARESOIL
    Percent (%) of Bare Soil in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Percentage (i.e. 25.000 = 25%)

    ZOTHER
    Percent (%) of Other Non-vegetated Item in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Percentage (i.e. 25.000 = 25%)

    DATUM
    The Projection Datum of the GPS Point (Source: Roger Sanders)

    NAD 83.

    SOIL
    General Description of the Soils on the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual soil description of plot.

    LEAF_TYPE
    General Leaf Type of the Dominant Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual of leaf type description.

    PHYSIO
    Physiognomic Description of the Dominant Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual of physiology class type description.

    T2_HGT
    Height of the Canopy Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual and numerical of T2 height (whole & decimal numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Range in meters (i.e. 0.5 - 1 m)

    T2_COVER
    Relative Percent Cover of the Canopy Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of T2 cover (whole numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Midpoint of the Cover Scale = Percentage (i.e. 80 = 80%)

    T3_HGT
    Height of the Sub-canopy Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual and numerical of T3 height (whole & decimal numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Range in meters (i.e. 0.5 - 1 m)

    T3_COVER
    Relative Percent Cover of the Sub-Canopy Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of T3 cover (whole numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Midpoint of the Cover Scale = Percentage (i.e. 80 = 80%)

    S1_HGT
    Height of the Tall Shrub Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual and numerical of S1 height (whole & decimal numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Range in meters (i.e. 0.5 - 1 m)

    S1_COVER
    Relative Percent Cover of the Tall Shrub Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of S1 cover (whole numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Midpoint of the Cover Scale = Percentage (i.e. 80 = 80%)

    S2_HGT
    Height of the Short Shrub Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual and numerical of S2 height (whole & decimal numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Range in meters (i.e. 0.5 - 1 m)

    S2_COVER
    Relative Percent Cover of the Short Shrub Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of S2 cover (whole numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Midpoint of the Cover Scale = Percentage (i.e. 80 = 80%)

    S3_HGT
    Height of the Dwarf Shrub Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual and numerical of S3 height (whole & decimal numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Range in meters (i.e. 0.5 - 1 m)

    S3_COVER
    Relative Percent Cover of the Dwarf Shrub Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of S3 cover (whole numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Midpoint of the Cover Scale = Percentage (i.e. 80 = 80%)

    SPECIES
    Number of Plant Species Recorded at the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical count of plant species at each plot point.

    GPS
    GPS Unit Used (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual GPS unit name.

    H_HGT
    Height of the Herbaceous Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual and numerical of H height (whole & decimal numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Range in meters (i.e. 0.5 - 1 m)

    H_COVER
    Relative Percent Cover of the Herbaceous Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of H cover (whole numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Midpoint of the Cover Scale = Percentage (i.e. 80 = 80%)

    ANIMAL_USE
    Evidence of Any Animal Use in the Area (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual description of animal use.

    DISTURB
    Evidence of Any Disturbance in the Area (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual description of other disturbance.

    FRAME
    Plot Photo Frame(s) (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Whole number of the plots photo frame.

    ACCURACY
    Accruacy of the GPS Unit in Meters (Source: Roger Sanders)

    GPS accuracy from position.

    SLOPE_DEG
    Degree of Slope at Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of slope in degrees.

    ASPECT_DEG
    Degree of Aspect at Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of aspect in degrees.

    ZBEDROCK
    Percent (%) of Bedrock in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Percentage (i.e. 25.000 = 25%)

    T1_HGT
    Height of the Emergent Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual and numerical of T1 height (whole & decimal numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Range in meters (i.e. 0.5 - 1 m)

    T1_COVER
    Percent (%) of Bedrock in the Plot (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of T1 cover (whole numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Midpoint of the Cover Scale = Percentage (i.e. 80 = 80%)

    N_HGT
    Height of the Non-vasular Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Textual and numerical of N height (whole & decimal numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Range in meters (i.e. 0.5 - 1 m)

    N_COVER
    Percent cover of the Non-vasular Stratum (Source: Roger Sanders)

    Numerical of N cover (whole numbers).

    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:100
    Units:Midpoint of the Cover Scale = Percentage (i.e. 80 = 80%)

    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    Attributes were either generated by ArcInfo or assigned by Washita Battlefield National Historic Site, Roger Sanders or NatureServe.
    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
    Washita Battlefield National Historic Site Mapping Project Final Report (DOI - USGS/USBR)

  8. What biological taxa does this data set concern?

    Taxonomy:
    Keywords/Taxon:
    Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
    Taxonomic_Keywords: Standardized National Vegetation Classification System
    Taxonomic_Keywords: vegetation classification
    Taxonomic_Keywords: alliance
    Taxonomic_Keywords: community association
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Plantae


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

    • USBR Remote Sensing and GIS Group, Denver, Colorado

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    USBR Remote Sensing and GIS Group: Mike Pucherelli. Others: Dan Cogan (Cogan Technology Inc.), Roger Sanders (formally with the Botanical Research Institute of Texas) and Jim Drake (Nature Serve).

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Bureau of Reclamation
    c/o Mike Pucherelli
    Group Manager
    P.O. Box 25007 Bldg. 56 Denver Federal Center M.S. D-8260
    Denver, Colorado 80225
    United States of America

    303-445-2267 (voice)
    303-445-6337 (FAX)
    mpucherelli@do.usbr.gov

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am - 5 pm
    Contact_Instructions: None


Why was the data set created?

Plots were collected to characterize the vegetation at LWashita Battlefield National Historic Site and vicinity. This GIS layer was created from the GPS coordinates recorded at the center of each plot to map their distribution and location in the Park.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

    None (source 1 of 1)
    None, None, None.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: None
    Source_Contribution: None

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: Unknown (process 1 of 5)
    Plots were subjectively placed by qualified ecologists to characterize the plant communities. Portions of the methodology were derived from the USGS/NPS Vegetation Mapping Program's Field Methods for Vegetation Mapping standard. Vegetation data in each sample plot was recorded by qualified ecologists using a standard NVC plot data collection form. Data was manually transferred to a MS Access database. Point coverage was created by importing the database into ArcView as an event theme.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Dan Cogan
    Cogan Technology Inc.
    Vice-President
    21 Valley Road
    Galena, Illinois 61036
    United States of America

    815-777-1773 (voice)
    None (FAX)
    dancogan@cogantech.com

    Hours_of_Service: 8 am - 5 pm
    Contact_Instructions: None

    Data sources used in this process:

    • None

    Data sources produced in this process:

    • None

    Date: Unknown (process 2 of 5)
    Metadata imported.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • C:\Projects\nps\grte\CD\GIS_Data\NAD83\Vegetation_Data\Field_Plots\2002_Plots\Spatial_data\metadata.xml

    Date: Unknown (process 3 of 5)
    Metadata imported.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • C:\Projects\nps\grte\CD\GIS_Data\NAD83\Vegetation_Data\Field_Plots\2002_Plots\Spatial_data\2002_plots_cov\plots_2002\metadata.xml

    Date: Unknown (process 4 of 5)
    Metadata imported.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • C:\DOCUME~1\Dan\LOCALS~1\Temp\xml6C.tmp

    Date: Unknown (process 5 of 5)
    Metadata imported.

    Data sources used in this process:

    • C:\DOCUME~1\Dan\LOCALS~1\Temp\xml41.tmp

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    Positional accuracy is only as good as the GPS receiver used. Thematic accuracy was not checked for this layer. Thematic data was collected on the ground by trained ecologists.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    GPS accuracy varies for each plot. No GPS error or PDOP values were recorded.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

    GPS accuracy varies for each plot.

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    All field plots collected in 2005 at Washita Battlefield National Historic Site are included in this coverage.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    All point features were checked for uniqueness and for correct and complete attributing.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints: None

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    USGS/CSS/Core Science Analytics and Synthesis
    c/o USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Coordinator
    Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Room 8000, MS 302
    Denver, Colorado 80225

    (303) 202-4220 (voice)
    303-202-4219 (FAX)
    gs-b-npsveg@usgs.gov

  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    Downloadable Data

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    The U.S. Geological Survey and the National Park Service shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. These data and related graphics (if available) are not legal documents and are not intended to be used as such.

    The information contained in these data is dynamic and may change over time. The data are not better than the original sources from which they were derived. It is the responsibility of the data user to use the data appropriately and consistent within the limitations of geospatial data in general and these data in particular. Any related graphics (if available) are intended to aid the data user in acquiring relevant data; it is not approriate to use the related graphics as data.

    The U.S. Geological Survey and the National Park Service gives no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data. It is strongly recommended that these data are directly acquired from an U.S. Geological Survey and National Park Service servers and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the utility of the data on another system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data. It is also strongly recommended that careful attention be paid to the contents of the metadata file associated with these data. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this metadata report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey and National Park Service.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 13-Mar-2008
Last Reviewed: 18-Jun-2010
Metadata author:
USGS/CSS/Core Science Analytics and Synthesis
c/o USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Coordinator
Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Room 8000, MS 302
Denver, Colorado 80225

(303) 202-4220 (voice)
303-202-4219 (FAX)
gs-b-npsveg@usgs.gov

Metadata standard:
FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001.1-1999)
Metadata extensions used:


Generated by mp version 2.9.12 on Fri Jun 18 12:11:32 2010

Return to USGS Vegetation Characterization Program at Washita Battlefield National Historic Site
USGS Home :: Geology :: Geography :: Water
Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices
Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL: biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/waba/metawabafield.faq.html
Page Contact Information:gs-b-npsveg@usgs.gov
Page Last Modified: Sunday, 15-Jan-2012 14:12:00 MST